Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Palmer v. City and County of Denver, et al
as 19-1171
Defendant / Appellee:
WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD, CINDY ACKERMAN, GARRY HINTERLITER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK PALMER
Palmer v. City & County of Denver, The et al
as 1:2018cv01003
Plaintiff:
Mark Palmer
Defendant:
City & County of Denver, The, Workforce Investment Board (WIB) Member, The, Denver Office of Economic Development-Workforce Development and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Brian Lawrence & Associates v. Lenders for Community Developm, et al
as 10-17927
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN LAWRENCE & ASSOCIATES, (BLAA)
Defendant - Appellee:
LENDERS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, (LCD), AKA Opportunity Fund, ERIC WEAVER, DEVIN MCALPINE and others
Brian Lawrence & Associates (BLAA) v. Lenders for Community Development (LCD) & AKA Opportunity Fund And Its Agents et al
as 3:2010cv00619
Plaintiff:
Brian Lawrence & Associates (BLAA)
Defendant:
Lenders for Community Development (LCD) & AKA Opportunity Fund And Its Agents, Lenders for Community Development (LCD) & AKA Opportunity Fund And Its Agents, Eric Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Gagliardi v. Sullivan, et al
as 06-2680
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GAGLIARDI, individually and in his capacity as a Member of the Merrimack Valley Workforce Investment Board
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. SULLIVAN and LAWRENCE, MA
Defendant:
MITT ROMNEY, as the Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, RANCH C. KIMBALL, as Secretary of the Executive Office of Economic Development and SUSAN V. LAWLER, individually and as Commissioner of the Massachusetts Division of Career Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
