Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Minton v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2024cv01750
Plaintiff:
Robert Minton
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Atlanta Police Department, Officer Balmore Cruz and others
Pitt v. City of Fairburn, GA et al
as 1:2023cv01729
Plaintiff:
Myron Pitt
Defendant:
City of Fairburn, GA, Officer John Doe and Fairburn Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEGRIN v. HARVEY et al
as 1:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
ERIC M NEGRIN
Defendant:
SGT HARVEY, OFFICER BENNETT, OFFICER JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIDLEY v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, WARDEN LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON, WARDEN WILKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2022cv02209
Plaintiff:
Ashley Dixon
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 1, Officer John Doe 2, Police Chief Erika Shields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
George v. Horne et al
as 1:2022cv02176
Plaintiff:
Sean George
Defendant:
Officer J. Horne, Officer FNU Deegan, Officer FNU Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Maddox et al
as 1:2022cv00894
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Brown
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
Marcus E. Malone
Defendant:
Aaron C. Johnson, Officer John Doe #1, Officer John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPIVEY v. HUMPHREY et al
as 5:2021cv00467
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Defendant:
WARDEN HUMPHREY, MALONE, DR JOHN ROWLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Caldwell et al
as 3:2021cv00074
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mark Clark
Defendant:
Warden Antoine Caldwell, Johnson State Prison, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
