Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. Mark Yates, et al
as 25-5310
Plaintiff:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant:
MARK YATES, WALL & ASSOCIATES, INC., JOHN P. YATES, Warden, BOP and others
Daniel Apostle Cardenas v. City of Beverly Hills et al
as 2:2024cv10104
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, inclusive, Officer Billingsley, Officer Rendon and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Apostle Cardenas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stinson Sr. v. Fowlkes et al
as 2:2024cv02870
Defendant:
Joedae L. Jenkins, Patrick E. Stegall, LT. Randle and others
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stinson Sr. v. Fowlkes et al
as 1:2024cv24354
Defendant:
Wall & Associates, Inc., Larry C. Miller, DBA MR. COOPER NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLCS and others
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stinson v. Mark Yates and Wall & Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Defendant:
Mark Yates, Wall & Associates, Inc., John P. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stinson v. Mark Yates and Wall & Associates, Inc.
as 1:2023cv24688
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Defendant:
Mark Yates, Wall & Associates, Inc., John P. Yates and others
Consolidated Defendant:
John T. Fowlkes, Damon Keith Griffin, Nathan Patrick Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. K. Cauley, et al
as 22-5998
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
BOP OFFICER K. CAULEY, FCI Forrest City, AR. Sued in individual and official capacity, CAMP ADMINISTRATOR THOMAS, FCI Forrest City, AR. Sued in individual and official capacity, ASSISTANT WARDEN HALL, FCI Forrest City, AR. Sued in individual and official capacity and others
Stinson v. Cauley et al
as 2:2022cv02611
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
K. Cauley, Asst. Warden Hall, Camp Admin Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
