Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Justice v. Baldwin et al
as 2:2022cv02207
Plaintiff:
Lotus Justice and Lotus Justice, restricted
Defendant:
Dallas Baldwin, Franklin County Sheriffs Department, Armor Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Ohio Department of Correction
as 3:2021cv01577
Plaintiff:
Mitchell D. Hudson
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Dahlby et al
as 1:2021cv01255
Plaintiff:
Zabe Jenkins
Defendant:
Lisa Booth, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation, Warden Tim McConahay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Buddin et al
as 4:2020cv03241
Plaintiff:
Leroy Griffin and Leroy Anthony Griffin
Defendant:
Ofc. Ohio Duke, Corp. Ms. Pressley, Lt. Mr. Courtney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Chambers-Smith
as 4:2020cv01583
Plaintiff:
James A. Day, Jr.
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith
Interested Party:
Interested Party State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Moon v. Richland Correctional Inst. State of Ohio
as 1:2019cv01250
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Moon
Defendant:
Richland Correctional Inst. State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy v. Richland Correctional Inst./State of Ohio
as 1:2019cv01068
Defendant:
Richland Correctional Inst./State of Ohio
Plaintiff:
James B. Kennedy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shephard v. Alinet et al
as 4:2019cv01051
Defendant:
Damons Hininger, Mona Parks, Ford and others
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Dean Shephard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobs v. State Of Ohio et al
as 4:2019cv00557
Respondent:
Ohio Adult Parole Authority, Lyneal Wainwright, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction and others
Petitioner:
Phillip Douglas Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Bismillah v. Bureau of Medical Services et al
as 3:2018cv02741
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr, Stuart Hudson, Bureau of Medical Services and others
Plaintiff:
Bismillah and Phillip Douglas Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
