Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Gonzalez v. USA
as 5:2017cv00070
Petitioner:
Omar Gonzalez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Omar Gonzalez v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv00991
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Omar Gonzalez
Gonzalez v. ICELL Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv06988
Defendant:
John Does #1-10, ICELL Incorporated and Sunny Singh
Plaintiff:
Omar Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. Ruben Gonzalez Contrera
as 16-41379
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RUBEN OMAR GONZALEZ CONTRERAS
United States of America v. Ardila
as 16-3152
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Daniel Caro and Christopher Carillo, AKA Christopher Carrillo
Defendant - Appellant:
Jorge Orlando Ardila, AKA Omar, AKA The Old Man, AKA Cesar Tulio Zuniga-Pacheco, AKA Jorge Builis, AKA Omar Gonzalez, AKA Angel Rivera
Omar Gonzalez v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-60530
Petitioner:
OMAR GONZALEZ
Respondent:
LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Alonso-Diaz et al v. Superior Electrical, Mechanical & Plumbing, Inc.
as 2:2016cv01737
Counter Defendant:
Marta Alonso-Diaz, Omar Gonzalez and Denny Suarez
Plaintiff:
Marta Alonso-Diaz, Omar Gonzalez and Denny Suarez
Counter Claimant:
Superior Electrical, Mechanical & Plumbing, Inc.
Defendant:
Superior Electrical, Mechanical & Plumbing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00247
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Omar Gonzalez v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-60446
Petitioner:
OMAR GONZALEZ
Respondent:
LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gonzalez v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv00100
Plaintiff:
Omar Gonzalez
Defendant:
Jeh Charles Johnson, Philip T Miller and Marcello Villegas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
