Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Outdoor One Communications LLC v. Charter Township of Canton, MI
as 24-1496
Plaintiff:
OUTDOOR ONE COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Defendant:
CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF CANTON, MI
Outdoor One Communications LLC v. Clinton, Charter Township of
as 2:2024cv11479
Plaintiff:
Outdoor One Communications LLC
Defendant:
Clinton, Charter Township of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Outdoor One Communications LLC v. Novi, City of
as 5:2023cv10754
Plaintiff:
Outdoor One Communications LLC
Defendant:
Novi, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
Outdoor One Communications LLC v. Canton, Charter Township of
as 2:2023cv10492
Plaintiff:
Outdoor One Communications LLC
Defendant:
Canton, Charter Township of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Phase One Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06603
Plaintiff:
Xavier White
Defendant:
Phase One Network, Inc., Frank Babar and Phase One Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Outdoor One Communications LLC v. Commerce Township
as 2:2022cv10737
Plaintiff:
Outdoor One Communications LLC
Defendant:
Commerce Township
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Outdoor One Communications LLC v. Walker, City of
as 1:2021cv00901
Plaintiff:
Outdoor One Communications LLC
Defendant:
Walker, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
