Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01018
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Geboy, Mark v. Oneida County et al
as 3:2019cv00574
Defendant:
Oneida County Sheriff's Office, Timothy Johnson, Michael Baran and others
Plaintiff:
Network Health Plan, Mark M. Geboy and State of Wisconsin Department of Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferris v. Oneida County Jail et al
as 2:2019cv00950
Defendant:
Staff, Renee Fabianski and Oneida County Jail
Plaintiff:
Alexander Joseph Ferris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Kusek, Michael et al
as 3:2018cv00867
Defendant:
Oneida County Wisconsin, Rhinelander Dental, Jill Kusek and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Oneida County v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 2:2017cv01559
Plaintiff:
Oneida County
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma LP, Purdue Pharma Inc, Purdue Frederick Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Boehm, William et al
as 3:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
William Boehm, Kay Boehm, Oneida County and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
United States of America v. Gensler, Bruce et al
as 3:2016cv00763
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Bruce Gensler, Julie Gensler, mBank and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luse, Duane v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 3:2014cv00297
Plaintiff:
Duane Luse
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin , O'Melia , Steven Detiene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luse, Duane v. Wege, Eric et al
as 3:2014cv00298
Plaintiff:
Duane Luse
Defendant:
Eric Wege , Eric Losee , Dan Gannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
