Contract Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Martin et al v. Optum Clinics Holdings Incorporated et al
as 4:2023cv00010
Plaintiff: Carmen P Martin, Milluna C Martin, Lyla M Martin and others
Defendant: Optum Clinics Holdings Incorporated, United Healthcare and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Ryan S. v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc., et al
as 22-55761
Plaintiff / Appellant: RYAN S., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., a Minnesota corporation, UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation and others
Type: Contract Insurance
ABC Services Group, Inc. v. Aetna Health and Life Insurance Company, et al
as 22-55631
Plaintiff / Appellant: ABC SERVICES GROUP, INC., in its capacity as assignee for the benefit of creditors for Morningside Recovery, LLC,
Defendant / Appellee: AETNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ANTHEM BLUE CROSS LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY, ANTHEM, INC., DBA Anthem Health, Inc. and others
Type: Contract Insurance
Glaze v. Pegasus Logistics Group et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00117
Plaintiff: Jeff Glaze
Defendant: Pegasus Logistics Group, UnitedHealthcare, Inc., UnitedHealthcare Of Washington, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Nana Serwaah Oddei v. ScanSTAT Technologies, LLC, et al
as 22-55035
Plaintiff / Appellant: NANA AKUA SERWAAH ODDEI, an individual, on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: SCANSTAT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Defendant: OPTUM, INC., a Delaware corporation, HEALTHCARE PARTNERS MEDICAL GROUP, P.C., a California corporation, DAVITA MEDICAL GROUP CALIFORNIA, P.C., a California corporation and others
UHS-Corona, Inc., et al v. Optum Services, Inc., et al
as 21-55751
Plaintiff / Appellee: UHS-CORONA, INC., DBA Corona Regional Medical Center, UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES OF RANCHO SPRINGS, INC., DBA Inland Valley Medical Center, a Campus of Southwest Healthcare System, DBA Rancho Springs Medical Center, a Campus of Southwest Healthcare System and TEMECULA VALLEY HOSPITAL, INC., DBA Temecula Valley Hospital
Defendant / Appellant: OPTUM SERVICES, INC., NORTH AMERICAN MEDICAL MANAGEMENT CALIFORNIA, INC., PRIMECARE MEDICAL NETWORK, INC. and others
Nana Akua Serwaah Oddei v. Optum, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv03974
Plaintiff: Nana Akua Serwaah Oddei
Interested Party: DaVita Medical Group California, P.C., ScanSTAT Technologies, LLC, HeathCare Partners Medical Group, P.C. and others
Defendant: Optum, Inc., HealthCare Partners Medical Group, P.C. and Does 1 through 20 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
County of San Bernardino v. United Health Group Incorporated et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00595
Defendant: UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., Mathis Bros., Oklahoma City, LLC, Unitedhealthcare Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: County of San Bernardino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Mathis Bros., Oklahoma City, LLC et al v. United Health Group Incorporated et al
as 5:2021cv00594
Defendant: Las Vegas Sands Corp., OPTUM SERVICES INC., Unitedhealthcare Insurance Company and others
Petitioner: Mathis Bros., Oklahoma City, LLC
Plaintiff: County of San Bernardino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Type: Contract Insurance
UHS-Corona, Inc. et al v. Optum Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv02556
Defendant: DOES 1 through 50, inclusive., Primecare of Riverside, Inc., Primecare of Redlands, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Temecula Valley Hospital, Inc., UHS-Corona, Inc., Universal Health Services of Rancho Springs, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?