Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Patrice Daniels, et al v. Eddie Jones, et al
as 23-3388
Plaintiff:
ASHOOR RASHO, PATRICE DANIELS, GERRODO FORREST and others
Defendant:
EDDIE JONES, Warden, Warden of Pontiac Correctional Center, WILLARD O. ELYEA, Doctor, Medical Director, WENDY BLANK, Chief of Medical Health Services of IDOC and others
Patrice Daniels, et al v. Latoya Hughes, et al
as 23-3110
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ASHOOR RASHO, PATRICE DANIELS, GERRODO FORREST and others
Defendant / Appellant:
EDDIE JONES, Warden, Warden of Pontiac Correctional Center, WILLARD O. ELYEA, Doctor, Medical Director, WENDY BLANK, Chief of Medical Health Services of IDOC and others
Otis Hunter v. USA
as 23-2176
Petitioner / Appellant:
OTIS HUNTER
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ronald Johnson, Sr. v. Kyle Jelinek, et al
as 23-1561
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD D. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
KYLE JELINEK, WILLIAM OTIS, PETER RANSTEAD and others
Ashoor Rasho, et al v. John Baldwin, et al
as 22-2816
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ASHOOR RASHO, PATRICE DANIELS, GERRODO FORREST and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN BALDWIN, Acting Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections, EDDIE JONES, Warden, Warden of Pontiac Correctional Center, WILLARD O. ELYEA, Doctor, Medical Director and others
Jill Otis, et al v. Marie Froh
as 22-2341
Plaintiff:
JILL OTIS
Appellant:
KYLEEN WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
MARIE FROH, also known as MARIE FLOS
Jill Otis v. Marie Froh
as 22-2041
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JILL OTIS
Defendant / Appellee:
MARIE FLOS, also known as MARIE FROH and MARIE FROH, also known as MARIE FLOS
Jill Otis v. County/State the People, et al
as 22-1867
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JILL OTIS
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY/STATE THE PEOPLE and REBECKEA SARGAW
Jill Otis v. Veronica Bulaon, et al
as 22-1851
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JILL OTIS
Defendant / Appellee:
VERONICA BULAON and ACC MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
