Cases 21 - 30 of 277
Arrington v. Epperson et al
as 4:2022cv04161
Plaintiff:
Otis Arrington
Defendant:
William Epperson, P. Lodge, A Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Story et al
as 1:2022cv06265
Plaintiff:
Micah Anderson
Defendant:
Otis L Story and Dennis Deer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashoor Rasho, et al v. John Baldwin, et al
as 22-2816
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ASHOOR RASHO, PATRICE DANIELS, GERRODO FORREST and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN BALDWIN, Acting Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections, EDDIE JONES, Warden, Warden of Pontiac Correctional Center, WILLARD O. ELYEA, Doctor, Medical Director and others
English et al v. EYM Chicken of Illinois, LLC
as 3:2022cv03202
Plaintiff:
Coshira English, Dawn Washington, Otis Childs and others
Defendant:
EYM Chicken of Illinois LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Otis v. Dpt. Health Services et al
as 3:2022cv50301
Plaintiff:
Jill Otis
Defendant:
Dpt. Health Services, Ana Rodriguez, Stacia Runge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jill Otis, et al v. Marie Froh
as 22-2341
Plaintiff:
JILL OTIS
Appellant:
KYLEEN WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
MARIE FROH, also known as MARIE FLOS
Jill Otis v. Marie Froh
as 22-2041
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JILL OTIS
Defendant / Appellee:
MARIE FLOS, also known as MARIE FROH and MARIE FROH, also known as MARIE FLOS
Jill Otis v. County/State the People, et al
as 22-1867
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JILL OTIS
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY/STATE THE PEOPLE and REBECKEA SARGAW
Jill Otis v. Veronica Bulaon, et al
as 22-1851
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JILL OTIS
Defendant / Appellee:
VERONICA BULAON and ACC MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
Arrington v. Donathan
as 4:2022cv04081
Plaintiff:
Otis Arrington
Defendant:
Greg Donathan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
