Cases 1 - 10 of 94
State of Alabama et al v. Nelson
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ALABAMA and ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant:
Otis Nelson
In re: Alex Ulep, et al v. State of California, et al
as 23-15806
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CIM-SQ TRANSFER CASES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO DELGADILLO LOPEZ, ALEX LOPEZ, ALEX ULEP and others
Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES and others
Leslie v. Unknown
as 1:2023mi00047
Plaintiff:
Otis: McNeil Leslie
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Grigor v. Luse et al
as 1:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
BONNY GRIGOR
Defendant:
Otis Luse and Justin Jackson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
In re: Michael Nickerson, et al v. Kathleen Allison, et al
as 22-16513
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CIM-SQ TRANSFER CASES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL VAUGHN NICKERSON, EUGENE SAMUEL HALL, CHARLES CARTER, Sr. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KATHLEEN ALLISON, RON BROOMFIELD, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Du Truong Nguyen v. United States of America et al
as 8:2022cv01524
Plaintiff:
Du Truong Nguyen
Defendant:
United States of America, Otis D. Wright, II, Sheila English and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
In re CIM-SQ Transfer Cases
as 3:2022mc80066
Plaintiff:
Charles Carter, Sr., Robert Lee Cole, Lovell Colvin and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Ron Broomfield, State of California and others
Ace American Insurance Company et al v. Otis Elevator Company
as 4:2022mc00006
Plaintiff:
Ace American Insurance Company, Zurich American Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company and others
In Re:
Subpoena Ad Testificandum Issued to Thomas M. Sing
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
