Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Watson v. Porter et al
as 3:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
Deana Watson
Defendant:
Kenneth Porter, Otis Jenkins, Patrick Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10880
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Knight v. Detroit, City of et al
as 4:2023cv10295
Plaintiff:
Tyrese Davon Knight
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Detroit Police Department, Otis J. Funches and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Toshalyn Murray v. Tom Pyle, et al
as 23-3016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOSHALYN MURRAY
Defendant:
TOM PYLE
Defendant / Appellee:
ATHENS COUNTY, OH SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ATHENS COUNTY, OH CHILDREN SERVICES, ATHENS CITY, OH POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Murray v. Pyle, et al.
as 2:2022cv02047
Plaintiff:
Toshalyn Murray
Defendant:
Tom Pyle, Athens Sheriffs Office, Athens County Children Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kirn et al v. Health System et al
as 2:2021cv12078
Plaintiff:
Katie Kirn, Allison Sleezer, Angela Carr and others
Defendant:
Henry Ford Health System, Wright Lassiter III, Robert G Riney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv13116
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Slayton v. City of River Rouge et al
as 2:2017cv13875
Plaintiff:
Dominique Slayton
Defendant:
City of River Rouge, City of Wyandotte, Edward Otis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
People of the State of Michigan v. Smith
as 1:2017cv00815
Plaintiff:
People of the State of Michigan
Defendant:
Otis Lee Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
