Cases 41 - 50 of 1,095
Otis Mays, Jr. v. Fridley Police Department, et al
as 23-2599
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Otis Ray Mays, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Fridley Police Department, Chief of Police, Fridley Police Department, John Doe, Training Officer and others
Acheampong v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2023cv00434
Petitioner:
Kwaku Oti Acheampong
Respondent:
Virginia Commonwealth of and Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00889
Petitioner:
Otis Larue Hunter, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Acheampong v. Commonwealth of the State of Virginia
as 7:2023cv00396
Plaintiff:
Kwaku Oti Acheampong
Defendant:
Commonwealth of the State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acheampong v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2023cv00397
Petitioner:
Kwaku Oti Acheampong
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Madison v. Ramey et al
as 7:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
Otis Madison
Defendant:
K. Ramey, C. Vilbrandt, P. Sykes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. Stalsby et al
as 2:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Otis R Mays
Defendant:
SIS Officer Stalsby, James Kirkland, Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gibson v. Bickham
as 5:2023cv00861
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
E Dustin Bickham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Otis Hunter v. USA
as 23-2176
Petitioner / Appellant:
OTIS HUNTER
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Madison v. Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
as 7:2023cv00338
Petitioner:
Otis T. Madison
Respondent:
Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
