Cases 1 - 10 of 220
Pardinas v. Martin Martin Renovations, Inc.
as 1:2024cv21682
Plaintiff:
Otto Pardinas
Defendant:
Martin Martin Renovations, Inc. d/b/a Bath Fitter
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Pardinas v. Oscar Health, Inc.
as 1:2024cv21527
Plaintiff:
Otto Pardinas
Defendant:
Oscar Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Otto Archive, LLC v. Edstone, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Otto Archive, LLC
Defendant:
Edstone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Otto Archives, LLC v. Miami Residential Group Inc.
as 1:2024cv21283
Plaintiff:
Otto Archives, LLC
Defendant:
Miami Residential Group Inc. d/b/a 501 First Residences
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Robert Otto, et al v. City of Boca Raton, Florida
as 24-10537
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. OTTO and JULIE H. HAMILTON
Defendant:
CITY OF BOCA RATON, FLORIDA
Robert Otto, et al v. City of Boca Raton, Florida, et al
as 24-10478
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. OTTO and JULIE H. HAMILTON
Defendant:
CITY OF BOCA RATON, FLORIDA and COUNTY OF PALM BEACH, FL
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jerido v. Henline et al
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Antonio Orlander Jerido
Defendant:
Mike Henline, Ranier Daramus, James Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobson v. Horton
as 4:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
David Otto Jacobson
Respondent:
Jonathan W Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jacobson v. O'BRYANT et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
David Otto Jacobson
Defendant:
WILLIAM O'BRYANT, Deputy Lusk, Deputy Chief Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
