Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
DAVIS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2026cv09486
Plaintiff:
HADASSAH SHAYNA DAVIS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Collins v. Rias et al
as 4:2026cv00767
Plaintiff:
Leticia Collins
Defendant:
Cristian Rias, Wes Smith, Ralph Charles Ohm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Silva Hernandez et al
as 4:2026cv06015
Plaintiff:
Shamichael Scott Davis, Minor K D and Minor M D, Jr
Defendant:
Yordanis Silva Hernandez and Across America Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
DAVIS v. BISIGNANO
as 5:2026cv05310
Plaintiff:
TAMMY E DAVIS
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kimmel v. Myer et al
as 1:2026cv02104
Plaintiff:
Davie J. Kimmel
Defendant:
C.O. I Myer, C.O. I Vega, C.O. I Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. USA
as 3:2026cv01444
Petitioner:
MIKAL DAVIS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Johnson v. Davison
as 5:2026cv01908
Petitioner:
Joe Wayne Johnson
Respondent:
Kelli Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
WILCOX v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2026cv00209
Plaintiff:
KENNETH J WILCOX
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DAVIS and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon Joseph Berry v. Palmer et al
as 6:2026cv03060
Plaintiff:
Brandon Joseph Berry
Defendant:
Warden John Palmer, Charles Williams, Willie Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
