Cases 31 - 40 of 92
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Thomas Bodnar v. Maddax et al
as 5:2017cv01215
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bodnar
Defendant:
P. Johnson, Maddax, G. Sanchez and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Scott Kairalla, et al v. Amgen, Inc., et al
as 16-56769
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SCOTT KAIRALLA, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, CITY OF BOCA RATON POLICE & FIREFIGHTERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM, MELANIE MENDELL and others
Objector - Appellant:
DONALD HANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
AMGEN, INC., KEVIN W. SHARER, WILLARD H. DERE and others
In re: Larry Tevis, et al v. California Department of Veter, et al
as 16-60063
Debtor:
In re: LARRY TEVIS and NANCY TEVIS
Appellant:
LARRY TEVIS and NANCY TEVIS
Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and JAN P. JOHNSON, Chapter 13 Trustee
Johnson v. SHAC LLC, et al
as 2:2016cv01899
Defendant:
Anda Doe, Kala Doe and SHAC LLC
Plaintiff:
Robert P Johnson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
US v. Michael Johnson
as 16-4005
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL P. JOHNSON
In Re: Larry and Nancy Tevis
as 2:2015mc00069
Appellant:
Larry Tevis and Nancy Tevis
Appellee:
California Department of Veterans Affairs
Trustee:
Jan P. Johnson and Office of the U.S. Trustee (Sac)
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
