Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Warner v. Velardi et al
as 3:2016cv01924
Plaintiff:
Earl Warner
Defendant:
P. Velardi, Cook, K. Seely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp et al
as OKW/5:16-cv-00314
Plaintiff:
Neal Vaughn, III and Mina P Vaughn
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp and Does
Vaughn et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp et al
as 5:2016cv00314
Plaintiff:
Neal Vaughn, III and Mina P Vaughn
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MTG Finance, LLC v. Neubecker et al
as 1:2011cv00475
Plaintiff:
MTG Finance, LLC
Defendant:
Dennis M Neubecker, Ronald R Pope, Gina P Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kalim Muhammad v. Brenda Bethel, et al
as 10-13269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KALIM A.R. MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
BRENDA BETHEL, DALLAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, LAJENNA HATCHER and others
Muhammad v. Sisto et al
as 2:2010cv00143
Plaintiff:
Shaka Senegal Muhammad
Defendant:
D.K. Sisto, W. Rodriguez, M.B. Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John P. Vaughn v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-77475
Defendant:
A.r. Wilfley & Sons
Plaintiff:
John P. Vaughn
VAUGHN v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77475
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. VAUGHN and JOHN P. VAUGHN
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
VAUGHN v. AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC et al
as 2:2009cv69491
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND P VAUGHN and RAYMOND P VAUGHN
Defendant:
AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, ACANDS INC, ACANDS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
