Cases 1 - 10 of 2,977
Novitski v. Airbnb, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01205
Plaintiff:
Ashleigh Novitski
Defendant:
Airbnb, Inc., J & P Tropical Inc. and Patrizia Emanuela Bissi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Macdonald v. Andrus et al
as 1:2024cv11199
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Justin Andrus, Circuit Judge David J. Barron, Clerk, USCA Chanda J Beita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hassell v. Kimbark, et al
as 24-1442
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW-LANE HASSELL
Defendant:
DEVIN AILEEN KIMBARK, CHERYL L. KIMBARK, MARK KIMBARK and others
Thompson v. Carney et al
as 1:2024cv11184
Plaintiff:
Deric M Thompson
Defendant:
James P. Carney and Bernardi Auto Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
D'Amario v. Sturdy et al
as 1:2024cv11178
Plaintiff:
Arthur D'Amario, III
Defendant:
Mark E. Sturdy and Kyle P Heagney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams et al v. O'Brien at al
as 1:2024cv11161
Plaintiff:
Charles P Williams and Valencia Williams
Defendant:
Paul O'Brien, Town of Hanson, Michael Miksch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greaves et al v. Davis
as 1:2024cv11149
Plaintiff:
Kiera Greaves and Kiera Greaves p/n/g S.C.
Defendant:
David P. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Duarte v. Bridgewater State Hospital, et al
as 24-1387
Plaintiff:
ERIC J. DUARTE
Defendant:
BRIDGEWATER STATE HOSPITAL, WELLPATH LLC, CAROL A. MICI, Commissioner, Department of Correction and others
Goldstein v. B&B Commercial Masonry, INC.
as 1:2024cv11026
Plaintiff:
Nathan P Goldstein
Defendant:
B & B Commercial Masonry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
KILMARTIN v. KILMARTIN
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY P KILMARTIN
Defendant:
DEBBIE KILMARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
