Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lynch et al v. Dockery et al
as 1:2021cv07106
Plaintiff:
Shantay Lynch, B.C., A.F. and others
Defendant:
Patricia Dockery, P. Chang and John/Jane Does 1-5
Interested Party:
Office of the Corporation Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Thymes, et al v. Steven Chang, et al
as 20-55650
Defendant / Appellee:
LINGCHONG CHEN, an individual, HOULING CHEN, an individual, LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN P. CHANG, in its corporate capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUEVINA HENRY and JOHN A. THYMES
John A. Thymes et al v. Steven P. Chang et al
as 5:2020cv00261
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, Law Offices of Steven P. Chang, Houling Chen and others
Plaintiff:
John A. Thymes and Luevina Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mendez v. Chang et al
as 2:2018cv00396
Plaintiff:
Jesse Mendez
Defendant:
P Chang, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Amicus Curiae:
Office Of The Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv05601
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Williams v. Muniz et al
as 4:2017cv00098
Plaintiff:
Winston Williams
Defendant:
William L. Muniz, L. Gamboa, J Chudy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Muniz et al
as 1:2016cv01936
Plaintiff:
Winston Williams
Defendant:
William L. Muniz, L. Gamboa, J. Chudy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chang et al v. Hobbs et al
as 7:2016cv01752
Plaintiff:
Mario P Chang and Mary K Chang
Defendant:
Ken Hobbs, Calvin Hobbs , Tenn Tom Community Development Incorporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jackson v. Chang et al
as 2:2015cv00151
Plaintiff:
Perry Jackson
Defendant:
P Chang and Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Chang et al
as 2:2014cv00402
Plaintiff:
Perry Jackson
Defendant:
P Chang, R Martisek, Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.