Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Trevino v. Dotson et al
as 3:2023cv01311
Plaintiff:
Robert Trevino
Defendant:
E. Dotson, T. Ross, S. Newcomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Trevino v. E. Dotson, et al
as 18-15032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT TREVINO
Defendant - Appellee:
E. DOTSON, D. AMBRIZ, D. VEGA and others
Robert Trevino v. E. Dotson, et al
as 17-17216
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT TREVINO
Defendant - Appellee:
E. DOTSON, D. AMBRIZ, D. VEGA and others
Trevino v. Dotson et al
as 4:2015cv05373
Plaintiff:
Robert Trevino
Defendant:
E. Dotson, D. Ambriz, D. Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Lord et al
as 5:2015cv03528
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jones
Defendant:
P. Lord, W.L. Muniz and J. A. Beard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Hines, Star #20856 et al
as 1:2014cv10216
Plaintiff:
Quinton Russell
Defendant:
Chicago Police Detective Jeremiah Hines, Star #20856, Chicago Police Officer P. Lorde, Star #12405, Chicago Police Officer M. Gaines, Star #6030 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Chatman v. Richard Early, et al
as 09-15683
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES JAMES CHATMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD EARLY, Regional Administrator, JOHN CHEN, Chief Deputy Inspector General, M. MONTEIRO, Associate Warden and others
Florez v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2008cv00011
Plaintiff:
Armand Florez
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, James E. Tilton, Scott Kernan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Todd v. Lamarque et al
as 4:2003cv03995
Plaintiff:
Michael Andre Todd
Defendant:
A.A. Lamarque, R. C. Garcia , F.O. Chavez and others
3rd_party_defendant:
California Dept. of Corrections & Rehab. and Office of the Inspector General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chatman v. Early
as 3:2003cv02820
Plaintiff:
Charles Chatman
Defendant:
Richard Early, John Chen , M. Monteiro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
