Cases 1 - 10 of 122
COOPER v. CALIGURI et al
as 2:2024cv00910
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN COOPER
Defendant:
E CALIGURI, WELL PATH/CORRECT CARE, DR BASIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURK v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2023cv05042
Plaintiff:
ISHMAEL A. BURK
Defendant:
MS. DAVIS, PA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS and D. VARNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Musier v. MHM, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01047
Plaintiff:
Tyree Musier
Defendant:
MHM, Inc., Dr. Cousins, J. Rivello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. Chief Grievance Officer et al
as 3:2023cv01046
Plaintiff:
Daryl Cook
Defendant:
Chief Grievance Officer, Eye Doctor, John Doe, Secretary of PA Dept of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUMPHREY v. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS E. HUMPHREY
Defendant:
PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, UNIT MANAGER WITT and RNS CREVLING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Neff v. Walker et al
as 4:2023cv00752
Plaintiff:
Keith D. Neff
Defendant:
Walker, Armel, Brittain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley v. Constanzo et al
as 3:2023cv00473
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Jonathan Constanzo, Kyle Bruccoliere, Andrew Reber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMAS v. SORBER et al
as 2:2023cv00907
Plaintiff:
GAREY THOMAS
Defendant:
JAIME SORBER, DR. JOHN DOE, PA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS MED DEPT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2023cv00159
Defendant:
GREGORY G. BROWN and PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mustafa Ali v. Joseph Dupont, et al
as 22-3460
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MUSTAFA ALI
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH H. DUPONT, Chief Hearing Examiner, PA Dept. of Corrections and DR. HASPER, Psychiatrist, SCI Forest
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
