Cases 1 - 10 of 73
TICE v. WILSON et al.
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERT TICE
Defendant:
HARRY E. WILSON, PA STATE POLICE, MEGAN'S LAW SECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TICE v. WILSON et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
JAMES ROBERT TICE
Respondent:
HARRY E. WILSON and PA STATE POLICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. PA STATE POLICE DEPT. TROOP B
as 2:2023cv01868
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
PA STATE POLICE DEPT. TROOP B
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Worman v. Barasse,Esq et al
as 3:2023cv01488
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Worman
Defendant:
Nancy Barasse,Esq, John Henry "Shane" Scanlon,Esq, Ruth Borland,Esq and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CONIKER et al v. MONFORTOH et al
as 2:2022cv01184
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CONIKER, RESOURCE SOLUTIONS, LLC and PRESIDENT MICHAEL CONIKER
Defendant:
BISHOP JEFFREY MONFORTOH, RANDY CHRISTENSEN, JOSEPH EDWARD HUDAK, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Robert Johnson v. Jodi Cordner, et al
as 22-2438
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JODI L. CORDNER, DANIEL DELEO, PA STATE POLICE OFFICER GIBSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
ROTAR v. HENLEY
as 2:2022cv00674
Plaintiff:
ALEKSANDR ROTAR
Defendant:
JASON K. HENLEY and PA STATE POLICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cordner et al
as 1:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Jodi L. Cordner, Daniel Deleo, PA State Police Officer Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jennings v. Centre County et al
as 4:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Savoy J. Jennings
Defendant:
Centre County and PA State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
