Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Vititoe v. Paccar, Inc.
as 2:2015cv00255
Plaintiff:
James Vititoe
Defendant:
Paccar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Secura Insurance Company et al v. Kenworth Truck Company et al
as 2:2015cv00002
Plaintiff:
Secura Insurance Company , Timothy J. Pourpore and Pourpore Trucking, Inc.
Defendant:
Kenworth Truck Company, PACCAR, Inc. and Tru-Flex, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Horizon Lawn Maintenance, Inc. v. Columbus-Kenworth, Inc., et al
as 2:2014cv13779
Plaintiff:
Horizon Lawn Maintenance, Inc.
Defendant:
Columbus-Kenworth, Inc. , Hissong Group, Inc. , Kenworth Truck Company, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McVey v. The Hartford et al
as 2:2014cv01683
Plaintiff:
Loyce McVey
Defendant:
The Hartford and Paccar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Mellen v. PACCAR, INC.
as 3:2014cv00486
Plaintiff:
Kristina Mellen
Defendant:
PACCAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0215
Acuity Insurance Company v. PACCAR, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00923
Plaintiff:
Acuity Insurance Company
Defendant:
PACCAR, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Paccar Inc v. Dermody Truck Sales, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01042
Plaintiff:
Paccar Inc
Defendant:
Dermody Truck Sales, Inc., DTAC, LLC and Ronald J. Meyering
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Certain Underwriters At Interest At Lloyd's of London v. Caterpillar, Inc.
as 7:2009cv00071
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants, Caterpillar, Inc., Paccar, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters At Interest At Lloyd's of London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martin et al v. Paccar, Inc.-1 et al
as 1:2008cv01084
Plaintiff:
Glenn Martin and Deborah Martin
Defendant:
Paccar, Inc.-1 and Paccar Inc.-2
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Colopy v. PACCAR Inc.
as 2:2008cv00332
Plaintiff:
Todd Colopy and Todd Colopy
Defendant:
PACCAR Inc., PACCAR Inc. and PACCAR Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
