Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-30703
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McCall v. Shreveport et al
as 5:2008mc00039
Plaintiff:
Frank L McCall, Jr
Defendant:
City of Shreveport, Parish of Caddo, Patricia A Shacklette and others
Stephens v. Shimpf, et al
as 08-30262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE STEPHENS
Defendant - Appellee:
CAREY T SHIMPF and PARISH OF CADDO
McCall v. Caddo et al
as 5:2008cv00070
Plaintiff:
Frank L McCall, Jr
Defendant:
Parish of Caddo, City of Shreveport, Patricia A Shacklette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCall v. Carmounche et al
as 5:2007cv02228
Plaintiff:
Frank L McCall, Jr
Defendant:
Paul J Carmounche, Rebecca Irwin-Bush, Parish of Caddo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens v. Shimpf et al
as 5:2007cv01962
Plaintiff:
Joe Stephens and Joe Stephens
Defendant:
Carey T Shimpf, Carey T Shimpf, Parish of Caddo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCall v. Caddo et al
as 5:2007cv00621
Plaintiff:
Frank L McCall, Jr
Defendant:
Parish of Caddo and City of Shreveport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCall v. Shreveport et al
as 5:2007cv00516
Plaintiff:
Frank L McCall, Jr
Defendant:
City of Shreveport, Parish of Caddo, Jeffery P Victory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Caddo et al
as 5:2007cv00392
Plaintiff:
Bradley Dean Patterson
Defendant:
Parish of Caddo, Michael R Walker and Paul J Carmouche
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Caddo Parish Animal Control et al
as 5:2007cv00115
Plaintiff:
David L Hicks
Defendant:
Caddo Parish Animal Control, Caddo Parish Animal Control, Parish of Caddo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
