Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Hunter v. Paterson, et al.
as 24-1291
Plaintiff:
DAVID SAMPSON HUNTER
Defendant:
STATE MEDIA PERPETRATORS, RICK ALFREAD MANDEVILLE, SCOTT JONES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
CUBBY, ESQ. v. CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2023cv02842
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. CUBBY, ESQ.
Defendant:
CITY OF PATERSON, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COUNTY OF PASSAIC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sams v. Teekay LNG Partners L.P. et al
as 1:2021cv09572
Plaintiff:
Michael Sams
Defendant:
Teekay LNG Partners L.P., Teekay GP L.L.C., Kenneth Hvid and others
Garrett Collick, et al v. William Paterson University, et al
as 21-2281
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARRETT COLLICK and NOAH WILLIAMS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NANCY WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM PATERSON UNIVERSITY, KATHLEEN M. WALDRON, Esq., ROBERT FULLEMAN and others
Curtis Blackwell, II v. Lou Anna Simon, et al
as 20-2171
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAD DAVIS, Detective, in his individual capacity as a detective for the Michigan State University Police Department, LOU ANNA K. SIMON, in her individual capacity as president of Michigan State University, MARK HOLLIS, in his individual capacity as Director of Intercollegiate Athletics for Michigan State University and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS E. BLACKWELL, II
Interested Party:
ANDREW A. PATERSON, JR.
Widrick v. Montage Resources Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv09101
Defendant:
D. Martin Phillips, John K. Reinhart, Montage Resources Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Widrick
Paterson v. Nelson
as 20-60979
Defendant / Appellant:
John Nelson, in his individual capacity
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Richard Paterson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
