Cases 31 - 40 of 588
Kassim Mouzone v. Community Improvement, et al
as 22-3405
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KASSIM MOUZONE
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT, AGENCY, JERRY LOBOZZO, OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CONSTRUCTION DIRECTOR, CITY OF PATERSON, MAYORS ADMINISTRATION and others
PATERSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2022cv07423
Plaintiff:
DENISE A PATERSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
LEAK v. CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2022cv06994
Defendant:
KENDRY TINEO, CITY OF PATERSON, PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
DESYIAH LEAK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HERNANDEZ v. CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2022cv06763
Plaintiff:
Rosdward Hernandez
Defendant:
CITY OF PATERSON, CHIEF OF POLICE IBRAHIM BAYCORA, KEVIN PATINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALSAIDI v. CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2022cv06697
Plaintiff:
OSAMAH ALSAIDI
Defendant:
CITY OF PATERSON, PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF OF POLICE IBRAHIM BAYCORA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PATERSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19232
Plaintiff:
ALISTER RODNEY PATERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Fontain v. Nestor et al
as 1:2022cv00431
Defendant:
Judge Terry Nestor, Harjinder Sandhu, Terrance Alysius Nestor and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Fontain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RAHMAN v. PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 2:2022cv04657
Plaintiff:
HABIBA RAHMAN
Defendant:
PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
