Cases 31 - 40 of 143
Marcus Alls v. Patricia Stansberry
as 10-6510
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARCUS ALLS
Respondent - Appellee:
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00052
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Stansberry et al
as 1:2010cv00066
Petitioner:
Glen R. Nichols
Respondent:
Patricia R. Stansberry, Matthew F. Howard, William M. Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Stansberry et al
as 5:2010cv00017
Petitioner:
Torrance Jones
Respondent:
Patricia R. Stansberry and Zach Roeckeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Banks v. Stansberry
as 1:2009cv01374
Petitioner:
Ronald D. Banks
Respondent:
Patricia R. Stansberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Stansberry et al
as 1:2009cv01358
Petitioner:
Torrance Jones
Respondent:
Patricia R. Stansberry and Zach Roeckeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Larry Young v. Patricia Stansberry
as 09-8174
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY ARNOLD YOUNG
Respondent - Appellee:
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden
Young v. Stansberry
as 1:2009cv01276
Petitioner:
Larry Arnold Young
Respondent:
Patricia R. Stansberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Stansberry et al
as 2:2009cv00524
Petitioner:
Varian Lorenzo Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Patricia R. Stansberry and Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Solan v. Rice et al
as 3:2009cv00643
Plaintiff:
David Solan
Defendant:
Benjamin Rice, John/Jane Doe 1, Patricia R. Stansberry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
