Cases 21 - 30 of 90
Robinson v. Hadnot et al
as 1:2018cv00358
Plaintiff:
Patrick Robinson
Defendant:
C Hadnot, FNU Hawkin, L White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Mitchum et al
as 5:2018cv01021
Defendant:
Jimmy Patrick, Dewayne Estes, Billy Mitchum and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nickell v. Robinson et al
as 2:2018cv00884
Plaintiff:
William B Nickell
Defendant:
Patrick Robinson and Rebecca Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hamrick v. Allstate Texas Lloyds et al
as 4:2018cv01690
Plaintiff:
William Hamrick
Defendant:
Allstate Texas Lloyds and Patrick Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doc's Dream, LLC v. Dolores Press, Inc., et al
as 18-55487
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee:
DOC'S DREAM, LLC
Defendant-counter-claim-3rd-party-plaintiff - Appellant:
DOLORES PRESS, INC. and MELISSA SCOTT
Third-party-defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK ROBINSON, TRUTH SEEKERS, INC. and BOBBI JONES
Robinson et al v. Zeruk et al
as 8:2018cv00693
Plaintiff:
Patrick Robinson , Carlos A. Leyva and Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
Defendant:
James Zeruk and John Does 1-5, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Robinson v. Hadnot
as 4:2018cv00860
Plaintiff:
Patrick Robinson
Defendant:
Hadnot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Dolores Press, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00023
Plaintiff:
Patrick Robinson
Defendant:
Dolores Press, Inc. , Melissa Scott , Kevin Leichter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sutton v. Ivey et al
as 5:2018cv00110
Plaintiff:
Ronald . Sutton
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Jefferson Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 1:2017cv02713
Plaintiff:
DAVID JACKSON , PATRICK ROBINSON , DAVID CROUCH and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
