Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Williams v. Fidelity and Guaranty Life Insurance Company
as 1:2015cv04037
Plaintiff:
Paul Williams
Defendant:
Fidelity and Guaranty Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILLIAMS v. CITY OF QUINCY FLORIDA et al
as 4:2015cv00385
Plaintiff:
PAUL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF QUINCY FLORIDA and MICHAEL WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Jesse Williams
as 15-11683
Petitioner:
In re: JESSE PAUL WILLIAMS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Williams v. Department of Corrections
as 1:2015cv21047
Plaintiff:
Jesse Paul Williams
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Body v. Entrekin et al
as 4:2014cv02460
Plaintiff:
Paul William Brian Body
Defendant:
Todd Entrekin, Scott Hassell and Etowah County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payless Car Rental System, Inc. v. Bach Auto Group, Inc. et al
as 8:2013cv02022
Plaintiff:
Payless Car Rental System, Inc.
Defendant:
Bach Auto Group, Inc. and Paul Williams
Counter_claimant:
Bach Auto Group, Inc. and Paul Williams
Counter_defendant:
Payless Car Rental System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Scott v. Crews
as 9:2013cv80305
Petitioner:
Paul William Scott
Respondent:
Michael D. Crews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bostic et al v. National Football League et al
as 1:2012cv03048
Plaintiff:
Joe Earl Bostic, Jr. , Jami Bostic , Wendell H. Davis and others
Defendant:
National Football League and NFL Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
