Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Paul Driggers v. Louis Winn, et al
as 10-16817
Appellant:
PAUL WILLIAM DRIGGERS
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS WINN, Warden and UNKOWN PARTIES, John Doe I, John Doe II, Unknown Employees of the U.S. Bureau of Prisons
Paul Driggers v. USA, et al
as 10-16222
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL WILLIAM DRIGGERS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS and LOUIS WINN, Warden
Driggers et al v. Beck et al
as 1:2010cv00182
Defendant:
David Beck, Christina McNutt, Robin Jacobsen and others
Plaintiff:
Paul William Driggers, Desarae J Driggers, Csarena M Driggers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Horel et al
as 3:2009cv05314
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Williams
Defendant:
Robert A. Horel, M. A. Cook, Dayton N. Conover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Driggers v. USA
as 2:2009cv00468
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Paul William Driggers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Driggers v. Winn et al
as 4:2009cv00183
Petitioner:
Paul William Driggers
Respondent:
Louis Winn, USA and United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Paul Jensen v. M. Knowles, et al
as 08-17752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL WILLIAM JENSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
M. E. KNOWLES, Warden, S. M. KERNAN, Chief Deputy Warden, J. SILVA, Associate Warden and others
Jensen v. Adams et al
as 1:2008cv01214
Plaintiff:
Paul William Jensen
Defendant:
D. Adams, Lopez, Quinones and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Paul Driggers v. Idaho Department of Health and, et al
as 08-35515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL WILLIAM DRIGGERS
Defendant - Appellee:
IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND WELFARE, DAVID BECK, CHRISTINA MCNUTT and others
Williams v. Warden et al
as 1:2008cv00712
Defendant:
Warden, B. Gracewich, C. Pfieffer and others
Plaintiff:
Jean-Paul Williams
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
