Cases 1 - 6 of 6
OPENPITTSBURGH.ORG v. WOLOSIK et al
as 2:2016cv01075
Plaintiff:
OPENPITTSBURGH.ORG and JAKE WITMER
Defendant:
MARK WOLOSIK , JOHN P. DEFAZIO , RICH FITZGERALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMMEED-EL et al v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2015mc00215
Plaintiff:
SUDAN MUSLIMA HAMMEED-EL and DARNELL MONIQUE YOUNG
Defendant:
DARNELL MONIQUE YOUNG, PEDRO CORTES and SECRETARY OF STATE OF COMMONWEALTH OF PA
Cause Of Action: Motion for Order
Type:
Other Statutes
Benjamin Wang v. Therapeutic Health Collective Inc
as 2:2014cv02603
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Wang
Defendant:
Therapeutic Health Collective
Trustee:
Pedro Cortes
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Violation of Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Industria y Distribucion de Al, et al v. Vazquez, et al
as 13-2518
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INDUSTRIA Y DISTRIBUCION DE ALIMENTOS CAMARA DE MERCADEO, ASOCIACION DE INDUSTRIALES DE PUERTO RICO, CAMARA DE COMERCIO DE PUERTO RICO and others
Plaintiff:
TRAILER BRIDGE, FLEXITANK, INC., a/k/a Flexitank, PEREZ Y CIA DE PUERTO RICO, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BERNARDO VAZQUEZ, in his official capacity as Interim Executive Director of the Commonwealth of PR's Ports Authority and JESUS F. MENDEZ-RODRIGUEZ, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury of the Commonwealth of PR
Interested Party:
S2 SERVICES PUERTO RICO, LLC
Camara de Mercadeo, Industria y Distribucion de Alimentos et al v. Vazquez et al
as 3:2011cv01978
Plaintiff:
Camara de Mercadeo, Industria y Distribucion de Alimentos , Asociacion de Industriales de Puerto Rico , Camara de Comercio de Puerto Rico and others
Defendant:
Bernardo Vazquez and Jesus Mendez-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cortes et al v. The State Of Texas
as 4:2007cv02744
Plaintiff:
Pedro Cortes, Maria Del Rosario Torres, Carlos Gutierrez and others
Defendant:
The State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
