Cases 41 - 50 of 59
USA v. Pedro Cruz-Tercero
as 10-56982
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PEDRO CRUZ-TERCERO
USA v. Efren Velazquez-Bravo
as 10-41254
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EFREN VELAZQUEZ-BRAVO, also known as Pedro Cruz-Ramirez
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated v. Cruz et al
as 2:2010cv02593
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated
Defendant:
Pedro Cruz and Manuel Elenez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hernandez v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2010cv05352
Petitioner:
Pedro Cruz Hernandez
Respondent:
F. Gonzalez and People of Sup. Court, State of Cal.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Pedro Cruz-Castillo
as 10-41224
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PEDRO CRUZ-CASTILLO
USA v. Pedro Cruz-Castillo
as 10-41225
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PEDRO CRUZ-CASTILLO
Pedro Cruz-Tercero v. Tereser Banks
as 2:2010cv05228
Respondent:
Tereser Banks
Petitioner:
Pedro Cruz-Tercero
USA v. Mateo-Nicolas
as 5:2010mj00160
Material Witne:
Edgar Antonio Alfaro-Figueroa, Arturo Alvarado-Mexicanoz, Maritza Xiomara Aquino-Vasquez and others
Defendant:
Santiago Mateo-Nicolas (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Santiago Mateo-Nicolas
as 5:2010mj00160
Material Witne:
Edgar Antonio Alfaro-Figueroa, Arturo Alvarado-Mexicanoz, Maritza Xiomara Aquino-Vasquez and others
Defendant:
Santiago Mateo-Nicolas (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
-JS In Re: BAYSIDE LITIGATION, et al v. , et al
as 1:1997cv05127
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
TONY BACON , ANDREW GORDON , MICHAEL S. SHONTZ and others
Consol_defendant:
CLEMENT , MYERS , JOHN CONESKY and others
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
