Cases 1 - 10 of 11
BORIA et al v. THE HERITAGE AT ALEXANDER HAMILTON et al
as 2:2023cv22914
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER BORIA, ANDREW REYES, SONIALYS BORIA and others
Defendant:
THE HERITAGE AT ALEXANDER HAMILTON, ALEXANDER HAMILTON ASSOCIATES, LLC, PENNROSE PROPERTIES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
MEUGANG v. DEANWOOD et al
as 1:2022cv03475
Plaintiff:
YVONNE ESTER MEUGANG
Defendant:
HILLS LLC DEANWOOD, PENNROSE LLC, PROPERTIES LLC PENNROSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
FUNYAK et al v. PENNROSE MANAGEMENT COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv01331
Plaintiff:
GREGORY LOUIS FUNYAK and SHARON LYNN FUNYAK
Defendant:
MONROE MEADOWS HOUSING PARTNERSHIP, LP and PENNROSE MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WOMACK et al v. PENNROSE MANAGEMENT COMPANY et al
as 2:2018cv03195
Plaintiff:
DEVONDRIAN WOMACK, MELLISSA WOMACK and MELISSA WOMACK
Defendant:
OXFORD VILLAGE and PENNROSE MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Foy v. Pennrose Management Company et al
as 1:2013cv00416
Defendant:
Pennrose Management Company
Plaintiff:
Edward Foy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00870
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
