Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Allen v. Koenigsmann et al
as 1:2023cv05651
Plaintiff:
Peter Allen
Defendant:
Carl Koenigsmann, Susan Mueller, David Dinello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wharton v. St Joesph County Jail et al
as 3:2021cv00861
Plaintiff:
Peter Allen Wharton
Defendant:
St Joesph County Jail, St Joesph County Jail Dentist, N.P./Doctor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TREADWAY
as 2:2020cv01306
Plaintiff:
MR. PETER ALLEN TREADWAY, JR.
Defendant:
WEST CHESTER, CHESTER COUNTY, PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TREADWAY v. WESTCHESTER COUNTY PA
as 2:2020cv00309
Defendant:
WESTCHESTER COUNTY PA
Plaintiff:
MR. PETER ALLEN TREADWAY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen et al v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 1:2019cv08173
Plaintiff:
Spencer Jackson, Wayne Stewart, Peter Allen and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Mantaro, MD, John Doe #2, MD, Jon Miller, MD and others
Interested Party:
New York State Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TREADWAY v. WETZEL
as 2:2019cv00154
Defendant:
SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL
Plaintiff:
MR. PETER ALLEN TREADWAY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Treadway v. Wetzel
as 6:2019cv00198
Plaintiff:
Peter Allen Treadway, Jr.
Defendant:
John Wetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Treadway v. Wetzel et al
as 6:2018cv02236
Defendant:
Smart Communciations and John Wetzel
Plaintiff:
Peter Allen Treadway, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TREADWAY v. PA KEYSTONE STATE et al
as 2:2018cv01509
Defendant:
PA KEYSTONE STATE, PA DOE and BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Plaintiff:
PETER ALLEN TREADWAY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Sarracino v. Baltazar et al
as 1:2018cv00875
Respondent:
J Baltazar and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Petitioner:
Peter Allen Sarracino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
