Cases 61 - 70 of 81
Goodman v. Rappahanock Regional Jail et al
as 2:2013cv00011
Plaintiff:
James Edward Goodman
Defendant:
Rappahanock Regional Jail, Officer Peterson and Officer Rictor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mahjor v. Peterson
as 1:2012cv01461
Plaintiff:
Hamid R. Mahjor
Defendant:
James D. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Kforce Inc. v. Peterson
as 1:2012cv01358
Plaintiff:
Kforce Inc.
Defendant:
Samuel T. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Peterson v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00489
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Curtis W. Peterson
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Davenport et al v. City of Richmond, Virginia
as 3:2012cv00710
Plaintiff:
Donald Davenport , Montague Agee , Michael Alston and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
A.K.T., Juvenile et al v. Clark County DSS et al
as 5:2012cv00043
Plaintiff:
A.K.T., Juvenile, Kenneth E. Bennett, Shelly Sue Ott and others
Defendant:
Dr. Aldridge A. Boone, Clark County DSS, Frederick County DSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Oliver v. Peterson et al
as 2:2011cv00483
Plaintiff:
Junius C. Oliver
Defendant:
Sgt. Peterson, Capt. Nero and Ms. McPherson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
