Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Sampson v. Reed et al
as 1:2012cv00500
Plaintiff:
Ricky J. Sampson
Defendant:
Kasim Reed, Cayenne Mayes, Robert C. Godwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gozaloff v. The City of Hollywood Police Department
as 0:2012cv60138
Plaintiff:
Paul Gozaloff
Defendant:
The City of Hollywood Police Department, Joseph Siple, Alexander Chang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker et al v. Reed et al
as 1:2011cv03334
Plaintiff:
Jason Walker , Kacy Daniel , Antonio Daniel and others
Defendant:
Kasim Reed, Stalone Davis, Brandon Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. United States [central] government
as 0:2011cv61969
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chapman and Roanne Eye
Defendant:
United States [central] government, Federico A. Moreno, Rick Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosales v. Petty
as 6:2011cv01185
Plaintiff:
Jose F. Rosales
Defendant:
Esther J. Petty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Guettler v. The City of Montgomery et al
as 2:2011cv00573
Plaintiff:
Lawrence H. Guettler, Jr.
Defendant:
The City of Montgomery , Dorian Brunson , Jerry Petty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Petersen v. The Florida Bar et al
as 6:2010cv00086
Plaintiff:
Robin Petersen and Robin Petersen
Defendant:
The Florida Bar, Jesse H. Diner, Maryanne Downs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Petty v. Klokoc et al
as 8:2009cv02599
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Petty
Defendant:
Anthony Klokoc, Diana Klokoc, Nathaniel McQuay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv01465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
