Cases 81 - 90 of 229
HAYES v. BROWN et al
as 2:2018cv00189
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, GARRIS, LAURIE PETTY and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTERO LAWRENCE HAYES
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petty v. Abbott Laboratories Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00917
Plaintiff:
Kyle Petty
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories Inc. and Abbvie Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARRUTHERS v. SMITH et al
as 2:2018cv00161
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE CARRUTHERS
Defendant:
DOUG EVANS, PATTY LEE FOREMAN, K. HARTZELL and others
Miscellaneou:
PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Petties v. Skutt et al
as 4:2018cv04023
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Petties
Defendant:
. Skutt, . Brimble and . Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAYNE v. GANNON et al
as 1:2018cv00076
Defendant:
AMBER ALLEN, LENA ANDERSON, MEGAN ANDREWS and others
Plaintiff:
SARAH RAYNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MULLINS v. WEXFORD HEALTHCARE SOURCES et al
as 2:2017cv00547
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, KIM HOBSON, ROBERT LUNDY and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L. MULLINS
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pettis v. Dart et al
as 1:2017cv08417
Plaintiff:
Natassia Pettis
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cook County Dep of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HULL v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2017cv00435
Defendant:
A. BENEFIEL, LAURA PETTY and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HULL
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petties v. Daley et al
as 1:2017cv06347
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Petties
Defendant:
Daley, Madeem, Sikes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
