Cases 1 - 10 of 12
PGH BURGER AND FRIES, INC., v. FOREMOST GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGANINSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv01713
Plaintiff:
PGH BURGER AND FRIES, INC.,
Defendant:
FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
PGH GLOBAL (CAYMAN) LIMITED v. LIQUID INTERACTIVE LLC
as 5:2017cv00454
Plaintiff:
PGH GLOBAL (CAYMAN) LIMITED
Defendant:
LIQUID INTERACTIVE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REUBEN v. PORT AUTHORITY OF PGH et al
as 2:2014cv00869
Plaintiff:
VALERIE L. REUBEN
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY OF PGH and PROGRESSIVE INS.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REUBEN v. ALLEGHENY CO. DEPT OF AGING et al
as 2:2014cv00389
Plaintiff:
VALERIE L. REUBEN
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY CO. DEPT OF AGING, ALLEGHENY HOUSING, ALLEGHENY CO. LHEAP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. SCI PGH - MHU UNIT 2003 EMPLOYEE et al
as 2:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
JAMES HORACE ROGERS
Defendant:
SCI PGH - MHU UNIT 2003 EMPLOYIES, RJ, SMITTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. STANLEY et al
as 2:2012cv00439
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE ROGERS
Defendant:
KIMERLY STANLEY and CITY OF PGH POLICE DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. HENSON et al
as 2:2012cv00438
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE ROGERS
Defendant:
JOHN BENTLY HENSON and CITY OF PGH POLICE DEPT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARREN v. THOMAZ et al
as 2:2011cv07924
Plaintiff:
MAX GREGORY WARREN
Defendant:
CAMERON JIBRIL THOMAZ, ROSTRUM RECORDS, LLC, ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
ROGERS v. SCI PGH WESTERN PENITENTIARY et al
as 1:2010cv00131
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. ROGERS
Defendant:
SCI PGH WESTERN PENITENTIARY, SMITTY, TERRI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. MHU STAFF et al
as 1:2010cv00027
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. ROGERS
Defendant:
MHU STAFF, CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS and SCI WESTERN PEN PGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
