Cases 1 - 10 of 13
MATHIS et al v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2021cv01573
Plaintiff:
JANIIS MATHIS and LAWRENCE MICHAELS
Defendant:
JOHN CARNEY, CLAIRE DEMATTE, PERRY PHELPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Cody v. Phelps
as 2:2021cv01461
Petitioner:
JONATHAN CODY
Respondent:
S. W. Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 f
PHELPS v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2018cv02886
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT OVERMYER
Petitioner:
IDRIS PHELPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rizzuto v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2014cv00020
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Rizzuto, Jr.
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, James C. Barnacle, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHELPS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv00047
Petitioner:
RICHARD PHELPS
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, TABB BICKELL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARRIS v. WEAKNECHT et al
as 5:2012cv04056
Plaintiff:
DANIEL S. HARRIS
Defendant:
ERIC J. WEAKNECHT, FRANK CATALDI and LATSHA PHELPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. WEAKNECHT et al
as 5:2012cv03375
Plaintiff:
DANIEL S. HARRIS
Defendant:
ERIC J. WEAKNECHT, FRANK CATALDI and LATASHA PHELPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hagan v. Beard et al
as 1:2010cv00883
Plaintiff:
Damont Hagan
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Shirley Smeal, James Barnacle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hines v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00851
Plaintiff:
Buster Hines
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Jeffrey Beard, James A. Schildt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peet v. Beard et al
as 3:2010cv00482
Plaintiff:
Lawrence J. Peet and Lawrence J. Peet
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Ph.D., Then Acting Warden of the SCI Camp Hill, John A. Palakovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
