Cases 1 - 10 of 360
Michael Gorbey v. Brian Davis, et al
as 24-11527
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
BRIAN J. DAVIS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISIONS, JOHN DOE #1 and others
State of Alabama et al v. Phelps (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Wilfred Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Alabama et al v. Phelps
as 2:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Wilfred Phelps
Phelps v. Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines, Ltd.
as 1:2024cv20580
Plaintiff:
Ms. Kristen Phelps
Defendant:
Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines, Ltd. a Liberian corporation, d/b/a Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PHELPS v. WARDEN PERRY
as 7:2024cv00031
Petitioner:
WILLIE C PHELPS
Respondent:
WARDEN PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phelps v. Warden Perry
as 4:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
Willie C. Phelps
Respondent:
Warden Perry
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Standard Insurance Company v. Hamilton et al
as 3:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Standard Insurance Company
Defendant:
Peter Miles Hamilton and John Henry Phelps IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Kristen v. Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines, Ltd.
as 1:2024cv20579
Plaintiff:
Ms. Phelps Kristen
Defendant:
Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gordon et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv01717
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Eliot Gordon, Keith Eugene Mokher, Christopher Mongillo and others
Petitioner:
Lawrence Pierson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
