Cases 1 - 10 of 15
DOUGHERTY v. COUNTY OF VERMILLION, INDIANA et al
as 2:2022cv00579
Plaintiff:
DERRICK MATTHEW DOUGHERTY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF VERMILLION, INDIANA, TIM YOCUM and MIKE PHELPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Pramuk - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS v. Pramuk et al
as 3:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Susan E Pramuk and Susan G. E. Pramuk
Defendant:
Cheryl L Montalbano Rahmany, Patrick Pramuk, Cheryl Montalbano Rahmany and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pramuk v. Montalbano et al
as 3:2021cv00555
Plaintiff:
Susan E Pramuk and Susan G. E. Pramuk
Defendant:
Cheryl Montalbano Rahmany, Robert Montalbano, Cheryl M Rahmany and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIRCKS et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv00451
Defendant:
RICHARD PAYNE, JEFFREY KELLER, BENNII WELDY and others
Plaintiff:
KATHRYN DIRCKS and BARRY DIRCKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pramuk v. Phelps et al
as 3:2020cv00775
Plaintiff:
Susan E Pramuk and Susan G. E. Pramuk
Defendant:
Linda Cohen, Vicki Raftery, Lori Montalbano Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00531
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MWANGANGI v. NIELSEN et al
as 1:2019cv04105
Defendant:
BEN PHELPS, FRANK NOLAND, TREY HENDRIX and others
Plaintiff:
DAUDI M MWANGANGI and DAUDI M. MWANGANGI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HADDOCK v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2019cv02078
Defendant:
Paul W Bellows, Robert P. Ferguson, Michael B Wagner-Gilbert and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Haddock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schenke v. Phelps et al
as 4:2018cv00087
Defendant:
Matt Rosenbarger, Adam Ferguson, David Lord and others
Plaintiff:
James K Schenke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
