Cases 1 - 10 of 412
HYMAN v. WARDEN OF SCI HOUTZDALE et al
as 2:2024cv01194
Petitioner:
JAVON HYMAN
Respondent:
WARDEN OF SCI HOUTZDALE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HYMAN v. WARDEN et al
as 3:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
JAVON HYMAN
Respondent:
WARDEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trustees of the General Assembly of the Church of, et al v. Anthonee Patterson, et al
as 24-1306
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE CHURCH OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST OF THE APOSTOLIC FAITH INC and CHURCH OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST OF THE APOSTOLIC FAITH
Defendant:
ANTHONEE PATTERSON and ROCHELLE BILAL, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SHERIFF OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Defendant / Appellee:
LE WEAVER & ASSOCIATES PC, MICHAEL K. TWERSKY, ESQ., individually and in his role as attorney for The Trustees of the General Assembly, JOHN CARLTON THOMAS, individually and in his role as Trustee of the Church of the Lord Jesus Christ of the Apostolic Faith and others
DARRISAW v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2024cv00660
Petitioner:
KYREE HASAN DARRISAW
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
John Hart v. Steven Parkinson, et al
as 24-1201
Plaintiff:
JOHN HART
Defendant:
STEVEN PARKINSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A DETECTIVE FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, KATHRYN GORDON, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A DETECTIVE FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN P. O'NEIL, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS AN ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE PHILADELPHIA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S and others
Brandon Fake, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1113
Plaintiff:
BRANDON L. FAKE, SUSAN B. FAKE and CAITLIN B. FAKE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
BRASWELL v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2024cv00279
Petitioner:
XAVIER BRASWELL
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, SCI ALBION, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pennsylvania State Conference of NAACP Branches, et al v. Northampton County Board of Elections, et al
as 23-3166
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF NAACP BRANCHES, LEAGUE OF WOMAN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIANS ORGANIZED TO WITNESS EMPOWER AND REBUILD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, SECRETARY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Not Yet Classified:
RICHARD MARINO, DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE, DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Appellant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, BRYAN CUTLER, KIM WARD and others
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellee:
THE PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT and SENIORLAW CENTER
JOHNSON v. VON ROSENTIEL et al
as 2:2023cv04179
Plaintiff:
TARANI-ALIKE JOHNSON and TARANI A JOHNSON
Defendant:
MARTHA VON ROSENTIEL, MARTHA E VON ROSENTIEL, SHELLEY ROBIN-NEW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. District Attorney of Philadelphia County et al
as 2:2023cv04026
Petitioner:
Hakim Moore
Respondent:
District Attorney of Philadelphia County, Warden of SCI-Greene and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
