Cases 21 - 30 of 649
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
AYRES v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2019cv04203
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM and PHILA. SHERRIF
Plaintiff:
KELLY AYRES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
as 2:2019cv04226
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
Plaintiff:
DAVID DEMETREIUS HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESTATE OF STERLING COLE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv03924
Defendant:
ROBERT D TAYLOR, GERALD MAY, JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF STERLING COLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calvin Camps v. Louis Giorla, et al
as 19-1662
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DELANEY, WARDEN OF CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and LOUIS GIORLA, COMMISSIONER OF PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALVIN CAMPS
Marcus James v. Gregory, et al
as 19-1257
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN GERALD MAY, LIEUTENANT REYNOLDS, MR. JAMES KENNEY, Mayor of Philadelphia and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS JAMES
HOLMES v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
as 2:2019cv00040
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
Plaintiff:
DAVID DEMETRIUS HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DURHAM v. THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2018cv02113
Plaintiff:
EDWARD W. DURHAM
Defendant:
THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, CORIZON MEDICAL ASSOCIATES and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. COMMISSIONER OF PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2017cv05506
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BROWN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, CLARK, OSBORN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
