Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Williams v. Mitchell
as 1:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Roderick Lee Williams
Respondent:
Phillip Mitchell
Smith v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2024cv00234
Petitioner:
Tony Lee Smith
Respondent:
Phillip Mitchell and A.D.O.C.
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fleming v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Phillip Mitchell Fleming
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and Social Security Administration, Office of Appellate Operations
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Carsbia Taylor v. Cynthia Stewart, et al
as 24-10136
Plaintiff:
CARSBIA VAN TAYLOR
Defendant:
CYNTHIA STEWART, TERRY RABON, PHILLIP MITCHELL and others
Crafton v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Crafton
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, John Q. Hamm, Wendy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rives v. Hamm et al
as 4:2023cv01659
Petitioner:
Walter Richard Rives
Respondent:
John Q. Hamm, Phillip Mitchell and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Stennis v. Cynthia Stewart, et al
as 23-12232
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL LADON STENNIS
Defendant / Appellee:
CYNTHIA STEWART, JEFFERSON DUNN, TERRY RABON and others
Johnson v. Mitchell, et al
as 4:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Jon L Johnson
Defendant:
CO1 Phillip Mitchell, John Hamm, Capt. Gram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dent et al
as 4:2022cv00752
Plaintiff:
Jon L Johnson
Defendant:
Derrick M Dent, Phillip Mitchell, Roderick L Gadson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Mitchell, et al
as 1:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Jon L. Johnson
Defendant:
Phillip Mitchell, John Hamm, Capt. Gram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
