Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Robert Brand v. Superior Offshore Intl, Inc., et al
as 11-20494
Plaintiff - Appellee: CHARLES OGNAR
Defendant - Appellee: MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH INC, JP MORGAN SECURITIES INC, LOUIS E. SCHAEFER and others
Movant - Appellant: DON J. GORDON
Droplets, Inc. v. E*Trade Financial Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv00255
Plaintiff: Droplets, Inc.
Defendant: E*Trade Financial Corporation , E*Trade Securities, LLC , E*Trade Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc v. Cooney
as 4:2010mc00520
Plaintiff: Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc
Defendant: Jason John Cooney
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc v. Cooney
as 4:2010cv05081
Plaintiff: Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc
Defendant: Jason John Cooney
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Case name not on file
as 6:2010cv01687
Interpleader: Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REALTIME DATA, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Morgan Stanley et al
as 6:2010cv00426
Plaintiff: REALTIME DATA, LLC d/b/a IXO
Defendant: Morgan Stanley, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Bank of America Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
REALTIME DATA, LLC d/b/a IXO v. Morgan Stanley et al
as 6:2010cv00248
Plaintiff: REALTIME DATA, LLC d/b/a IXO
Defendant: Morgan Stanley, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Bank of America Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cellular South, Inc. v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00081
Plaintiff: Cellular South, Inc. and Cellular South, Inc.
Defendant: Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. and John Does A-J
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Kenneth Dean v. Merrill Lynch, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-20058
Plaintiff - Appellant: KENNETH E. DEAN
Defendant - Appellee: MERRILL LYNCH, UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES INC, also known as UBS Painewebber Inc, UBS PAINEWEBBER INC and others
Comprehensive Investment Services, Inc. v. Mudd et al
as 4:2009cv01444
Plaintiff: Comprehensive Investment Services, Inc.
Defendant: Daniel H. Mudd, Robert J. Levin, Stephen M. Swad and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?