Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv06038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv06036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banks-Hopkins v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2026cv05914
Plaintiff:
David Leotis Banks-Hopkins
Defendant:
Pierce County and Pierce County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lull v. Rohl et al
as 2:2026cv01374
Plaintiff:
Jason J Lull
Defendant:
Judge Elizabeth Rohl, ADA Joseph Scheiffer, Lt Donnie Knutson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuller, et al. v. Pierce Conservation District, et al.
as 26-5009
Plaintiff:
THOMAS P. FULLER, BARBARA J. DICKERSON and KATHERINE HARRISON
Defendant:
PIERCE CONSERVATION DISTRICT, dba Harvest Pierce County, DANA COGGON, KRISTEN MCIVOR and others
Hamilton-El v. Wagner, et al.
as 26-4929
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD FREDERICK HAMILTON-EL
Defendant:
LISA WAGNER, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney for Pierce County, CHANDRA CARLISLE, Attorney, JOHN DOES 1-10, Release, Records Officials and others
Hamilton v. Bucanan et al
as 3:2026cv05833
Plaintiff:
Earnest Lee Hamilton
Defendant:
Bucanan, Aroche, Bryer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rayner v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2026cv05735
Plaintiff:
Lewis E Rayner, Jr
Defendant:
Pierce County and Ian Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carrasco v. Pierce County District Court, et al.
as 26-4221
Plaintiff:
DONAVEN MARKUS CARRASCO
Defendant:
PIERCE COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, RYAN SAUNDERS, Pierce County Assigned Counsel, KELLY BARRETT, Pierce County Assigned Counsel and others
Mayberry v. Pierce County Washington
as 3:2026cv05698
Plaintiff:
Ian Dior Mayberry
Defendant:
Pierce County Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.