Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Howell v. Pine Street Inn, et al
as 24-1369
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant:
PINE STREET INN, MICHELLE WU and BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Howell v. Pine Street Inn et al
as 1:2023cv13135
Plaintiff:
Curtis Howell
Defendant:
Pine Street Inn, Boston Police Department and Mayor of Boston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Howell v. Massachusetts Attorney General Office et al
as 1:2022cv11028
Plaintiff:
Curtis Howell
Defendant:
Massachusetts Attorney General Office, Boston Police Department, Mayor Michelle Wu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hernandez v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv12291
Defendant:
Boston Public Health Commission, Pine Street Inn, Dan Clague and others
Plaintiff:
Berta Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mopecha v. Pine Street Inn et al
as 1:2018cv10444
Plaintiff:
Taboh Mopecha
Defendant:
Pine Street Inn, Dan O'Neil, Reginal Santos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Redley v. Conely et al
as 1:2017cv10340
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Lloyd Redley
Defendant:
Daniel Conely, Carla Barret, Judge Ernesto and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Lu v. Downie et al
as 1:2015cv11558
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Defendant:
Lyndia Downie, Rosemary Cashman, Fred Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
BREWER v. UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE et al
as 2:2010cv03204
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SHELDON BREWER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, UNITED STATES CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Pine Street Inn
as 1:2009cv10305
Plaintiff:
Dewey Jones
Defendant:
Pine Street Inn
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hollins v. Downe et al
as 1:2008cv11439
Plaintiff:
Anthony J Hollins
Defendant:
Lydia Downe, Lynne Chapman, David Sykes and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
