Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Harris v. Ganim et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Petitioner:
Gerard Vondrake Harris
Respondent:
Joe Ganim, Michael C. Jankovsky, Roderick Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Crystal Delta Pty Ltd v. Porter and Chester Institute, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00790
Plaintiff:
Crystal Delta Pty Ltd
Defendant:
The Porter and Chester Institute, Inc. and Porter and Chester Institute, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Carrasco v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2021cv01540
Plaintiff:
Fred Carrasco
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. Sage, Dukate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Round Hill Investments LLC v. Patane et al
as 3:2021mc00040
Petitioner:
Round Hill Investments LLC formerly known as Metropoulos & Co. LLC doing business as Metropoulos & Co and Metropoulos & Co. LLC
Respondent:
Mark J. Patane, Julie Harding, Heather Harrigan and others
One Rock Capital Partners, LLC v. Patane et al
as 3:2021mc00039
Respondent:
Mark J. Patane, Julie Harding, Heather Harrigan and others
Petitioner:
One Rock Capital Partners, LLC
Taylor v. Yoox Net-A-Porter Group Spa
as 3:2021cv00892
Defendant:
Yoox Net-A-Porter Group Spa
Plaintiff:
Robert Taylor
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Perry v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv00227
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Elbert Porter Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Sharp et al
as 3:2020cv00930
Defendant:
Sandone, Sharp, Alicia and others
Plaintiff:
Jamarle Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01080
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
