Cases 31 - 40 of 259
Rollins v. The President of The United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv01427
Plaintiff:
Randall E Rollins
Defendant:
The President of The United States of America, The Senate of the United States of America and The House of Representatives of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Colleen Huber v. Joseph Biden, et al
as 22-15443
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COLLEEN HUBER
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, TWITTER, INC. and JACK DORSEY, in his official capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Twitter and in his individual capacity
Brown v. 46th President of the United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv01954
Plaintiff:
DAmonte Brown
Defendant:
46th President of the United States of America and The White House
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State of Missouri v. Biden
as 22-40110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of Missouri and State of Texas
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security and others
U.S. Navy SEALs 1-26 v. Biden
as 22-10077
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. Navy SEALs 1-26, U.S. Navy Special Warfare Combatant Craft Crewmen 1-5, U.S. Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technician 1 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, Lloyd Austin, Secretary, U.S. Department of Defense, individually and in his official capacity as United States Secretary of Defense, United States Department of Defense and others
State of Missouri, et al v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 22-1104
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Missouri, State of Nebraska, State of Alaska and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as the President of the United States of America, United States of America, The Office of Personnel Management and others
State of Texas v. Becerra
as 22-10049
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas and Texas Health and Human Services Commission, (HSSC)
Defendant / Appellant:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Chiquita Brooks-Lasure, in her official capacity as Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Daniel Pohle v. Michael Pence, et al
as 21-3351
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL L. POHLE
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL R. PENCE, Former Governor of Indiana and Former Vice President of the United States of America, BARACK OBAMA, Former President of the United States of America, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Former Vice President and Current President of the United States of America and others
Domingo Gomez, et al v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 21-5288
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Domingo Arreguin Gomez, a Lawful Permanent Resident of the U.S., Mirna S., a Lawful Permanent Resident of the U.S., Vicenta S., a U.S. Citizen and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of State and others
The Associated General Contractors of America, Inc. et al v. Joseph R. Biden, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America et al
as 1:2021xc00226
Plaintiff:
The Associated General Contractors of America, Inc., The Associated General Contractors of Texas, Highway, Heavy, Utilities & Industrial Branch and TEXO, The Construction Association
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, United States of America, Office of Management and Budget and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
