Cases 41 - 50 of 136
GONZALEZ v. JORDAN et al
as 5:2020cv04962
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER MARK JORDAN, LEHIGH COUNTY JAIL, PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BULGER v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC. et al
as 5:2020cv04830
Defendant:
JUSTINE CLEMONS, PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC., JENNIFER KELLY and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LUKE BULGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOCK v. CAMBRIA COUNTY et al
as 3:2020cv00178
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC., CAMBRIA COUNTY PRISON, CAMBRIA COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY W. MOCK, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HARRIS v. RUSSELL et al
as 5:2020cv03745
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC., STEVE MILLER, DR. WILSON and others
Plaintiff:
LOGAN TYRELL HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. York County Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2020cv00539
Defendant:
Dr. Rameen Starling-Roney, John Doe Prison Guards 1-10, President Judge Joseph Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Rose Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kern v. Ramos et al
as 3:2020cv00053
Defendant:
L.P.N. Christine Feyjoo, D.O. Kenneth Wloczewski, Monroe County Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Renee Kern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANDLER v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. ET AL
as 5:2019cv06176
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. ET AL
Plaintiff:
NADIR NAIM CHANDLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SOM v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv05353
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILTY, COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, JUDITH MCILHONE and others
Plaintiff:
PURNIMA SOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SCHRUBY v. SIANNI et al
as 2:2019cv04206
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK SCHRUBY and TEEF
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, CLAYTON, JANE DOE NURSE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWMAN-BEY v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC. et al
as 5:2019cv02069
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC. and JESSE KIRSCH
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH NEWMAN-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
